Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Ironically, the test for DirIV races had a data race itself
by writing to a bool without taking a lock.
Found by running "./test.bash -race":
WARNING: DATA RACE
Write at 0x00c00001dea5 by goroutine 22:
github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/tests/defaults.TestDirIVRace.func1()
/home/jakob/go/src/github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/tests/defaults/diriv_test.go:39 +0x38
github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/tests/defaults.TestDirIVRace()
/home/jakob/go/src/github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/tests/defaults/diriv_test.go:73 +0x65c
testing.tRunner()
/usr/local/go/src/testing/testing.go:865 +0x163
Previous read at 0x00c00001dea5 by goroutine 23:
github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/tests/defaults.TestDirIVRace.func2()
/home/jakob/go/src/github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/tests/defaults/diriv_test.go:51 +0x8b
Goroutine 22 (running) created at:
testing.(*T).Run()
/usr/local/go/src/testing/testing.go:916 +0x699
testing.runTests.func1()
/usr/local/go/src/testing/testing.go:1157 +0xa8
testing.tRunner()
/usr/local/go/src/testing/testing.go:865 +0x163
testing.runTests()
/usr/local/go/src/testing/testing.go:1155 +0x523
testing.(*M).Run()
/usr/local/go/src/testing/testing.go:1072 +0x2eb
github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/tests/defaults.TestMain()
/home/jakob/go/src/github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/tests/defaults/main_test.go:21 +0xe1
main.main()
_testmain.go:76 +0x222
Goroutine 23 (running) created at:
github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/tests/defaults.TestDirIVRace()
/home/jakob/go/src/github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/tests/defaults/diriv_test.go:43 +0x48d
testing.tRunner()
/usr/local/go/src/testing/testing.go:865 +0x163
==================
--- FAIL: TestDirIVRace (0.00s)
testing.go:809: race detected during execution of test
FAIL
|
|
https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/349
|
|
Give the gocryptfs process one extra millisecond to close
files. Allows us to drop several other sleeps.
UnmountErr now really returns an error when it detects an fd leak
instead of just printing a message.
|
|
For now, this only prints a message but does not fail the tests.
|
|
Mostly detected with the 'codespell' utility, but also includes some
manual grammar fixes.
|
|
This currently fails because we do not use llistxattr
yet.
|
|
mv is unhappy when we return EPERM when it tries to set
system.posix_acl_access:
mv: preserving permissions for ‘b/x’: Operation not permitted
Now we return EOPNOTSUPP like tmpfs does and mv seems happy.
|
|
Make sure we get only 1 warning output per
problem.
Also, add new corruption types to broken_fs_v1.4.
|
|
We relied on the finalizer to close a few fds.
For some reason, this did not cause problems on Linux,
but on MacOS, it causes unmount failures:
umount(/private/tmp/gocryptfs-test-parent/194654785/default-plain): Resource busy -- try 'diskutil unmount'
|
|
Passes.
|
|
Due to RMW, we always need read permissions on the backing file. This is a
problem if the file permissions do not allow reading (i.e. 0200 permissions).
This patch works around that problem by chmod'ing the file, obtaining a fd,
and chmod'ing it back.
Test included.
Issue reported at: https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/125
|
|
Closes https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/84 .
|
|
This test reproduces the problem xfstests generic/124 uncovered.
The warning itself is harmless, but we should either (1) add locking
so that this cannot happen anymore or (2) drop the warning.
Currently fails:
$ go test -v
=== RUN Test1980Tar
--- PASS: Test1980Tar (0.00s)
=== RUN TestCtlSock
--- PASS: TestCtlSock (0.10s)
=== RUN TestOpenTruncateRead
--- PASS: TestOpenTruncateRead (0.00s)
=== RUN TestWORead
--- PASS: TestWORead (0.00s)
=== RUN TestXfs124
cipherSize 18 == header size: interrupted write?
-wpanic turns this warning into a panic: cipherSize 18 == header size: interrupted write?
|
|
We do not have to track the writeOnly status because the kernel
will not forward read requests on a write-only FD to us anyway.
I have verified this behavoir manually on a 4.10.8 kernel and also
added a testcase.
|
|
|
|
You used to be able to crash gocryptfs by passing "/foo"
of "foo/" to the ctlsock.
Fixes https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/66
|
|
This is a regression test for the issue that was fixed by the
last commit.
|
|
|
|
At the moment, in forward mode you can only encrypt paths
and in reverse mode you can only decrypt paths.
|
|
|
|
Test that we get the right timestamp when extracting a tarball.
Also simplify the workaround in doTestUtimesNano() and fix the
fact that it was running no test at all.
|
|
Also fixes the failure to run the benchmarks do to the missing
gocryptfs.diriv.
|