diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/comparison.md | 6 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/docs/comparison.md b/docs/comparison.md index 622b491..dae5b22 100644 --- a/docs/comparison.md +++ b/docs/comparison.md @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ The CPU is an Intel Pentium G630 with 2 x 2.7GHz. | | gocryptfs | encfs default | encfs paranoia | ecryptfs | cryptomator | securefs | | ------------------------ | --------- | ------------- | -------------- | --------- | ------------- | -------- | | Streaming write | 84 MiB/s | 104 MiB/s | 56 MiB/s | 130 MiB/s | 55 MiB/s | 60 MiB/s | -| Extract linux-3.0.tar.gz | 48 s {4} | 20 s | 23 s | 8.4 s | 468 s {1} {2} | 25 s | +| Extract linux-3.0.tar.gz | 26 s | 20 s | 23 s | 8.4 s | 468 s {1} {2} | 25 s | | ls -lR linux-3.0 | 1.9 s | 2.8 s | 2.8 s | 0.5 s | 127 s {3} | 4.2 s | | Delete linux-3.0 | 4.5 s | 3.9 s | 4.1 s | 0.5 s | 376 s {3} | 5.3 s | @@ -120,9 +120,7 @@ Notes: {1} All file acesses to cryptomator go through the WebDAV protocol, which is less performance-oriented than FUSE. However, an optimized WebDAV client may be able to significantly speed up small-file workloads. {2} Tested with the dave cli WebDAV client, which gave better speed than gvfs (Gnome built-in) and davfs2 -{3} Tested with gvfs in the `/run/user/.../gvfs/dav:...` mount -{4} Known performance limitation in the go-fuse library. See [gocryptfs ticket#16](https://github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs/issues/16) -for progress on a fix. +{3} Tested with gvfs in the `/run/user/.../gvfs/dav:...` mount Disk Space Efficiency |