diff options
| author | Jakob Unterwurzacher | 2016-01-22 22:40:23 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jakob Unterwurzacher | 2016-01-22 22:40:23 +0100 |
| commit | a2c3994ef6de3b8266658ff4dd3f635a26251607 (patch) | |
| tree | 864ae470afdc4ce05175d0e0c61e880b16da2a8a /docs/comparison.md | |
| parent | cbe632a453a13f579f18585678149c662e2f0183 (diff) | |
Add SSD test results
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/comparison.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/comparison.md | 19 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/docs/comparison.md b/docs/comparison.md index dae5b22..c2dfb8c 100644 --- a/docs/comparison.md +++ b/docs/comparison.md @@ -110,18 +110,27 @@ The CPU is an Intel Pentium G630 with 2 x 2.7GHz. | | gocryptfs | encfs default | encfs paranoia | ecryptfs | cryptomator | securefs | | ------------------------ | --------- | ------------- | -------------- | --------- | ------------- | -------- | -| Streaming write | 84 MiB/s | 104 MiB/s | 56 MiB/s | 130 MiB/s | 55 MiB/s | 60 MiB/s | -| Extract linux-3.0.tar.gz | 26 s | 20 s | 23 s | 8.4 s | 468 s {1} {2} | 25 s | -| ls -lR linux-3.0 | 1.9 s | 2.8 s | 2.8 s | 0.5 s | 127 s {3} | 4.2 s | -| Delete linux-3.0 | 4.5 s | 3.9 s | 4.1 s | 0.5 s | 376 s {3} | 5.3 s | +| Streaming write | 90 MiB/s | 104 MiB/s | 56 MiB/s | 130 MiB/s | 55 MiB/s | 60 MiB/s | +| Extract linux-3.0.tar.gz | 23 s | 20 s | 23 s | 8.4 s | 468 s {1} {2} | 25 s | +| ls -lR linux-3.0 | 1.7 s | 2.8 s | 2.8 s | 0.5 s | 127 s {3} | 4.2 s | +| Delete linux-3.0 | 4.2 s | 3.9 s | 4.1 s | 0.5 s | 376 s {3} | 5.3 s | +Repeating (a subset of) the tests on an Samsung 840 EVO SSD shows that ecryptfs falls behind in metadata reads +because its complex file headers causes extra disk accesses {4}. + +| | gocryptfs | encfs paranoia | ecryptfs | +| ------------------------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | +| Streaming write | 65 MiB/s | | 116 MiB/s | +| Extract linux-3.0.tar.gz | 26 s | 24 s | 8.7 s | +| ls -lR linux-3.0 | 2.5 s | 3.2 s | 8.6 s | +| Delete linux-3.0 | 5.3 s | 4.7 s | 8.8 s | Notes: {1} All file acesses to cryptomator go through the WebDAV protocol, which is less performance-oriented than FUSE. However, an optimized WebDAV client may be able to significantly speed up small-file workloads. {2} Tested with the dave cli WebDAV client, which gave better speed than gvfs (Gnome built-in) and davfs2 {3} Tested with gvfs in the `/run/user/.../gvfs/dav:...` mount - +{4} Caches are cleared between each test using `echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches` Disk Space Efficiency --------------------- |